Saints vs. Antipopes Evil in the Church of Rome Convicted and Evicted

by Edmund J. Mazza

Reviewed/ Commentary by Nich Flüe

This recently published 150-page book by Dr. Edmund Mazza (available on Amazon/Kindle)

caught my attention thanks to a subscriber to www.Nichscafeendtimes.com  I am pleased to say that Dr. Mazza did a wonderful effort studying the question of any “Pope being evil”. He provides thorough case studies complementing these cases with numerous “expert” opinions from theologians, Doctors of the Church and saints throughout the ages including contemporary church religious; plus definitive prophecies particularly from Marian Apparitions within the past two hundred plus years. Lastly, Dr. Mazza does a thorough effort on contemporary heretics and apostates withing the Church – particularly the leaders associated with the St. Gallen Mafia, e.g. the late Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, and of course Bergoglio and Prevost. It appears that Dr. Mazza is making a strong case for Bergoglio and Prevost being antipopes.

One may conclude that this subject ties directly into what the Venerable Holzhauser defines as “The End Times”, that is, not the end of the world but the end of the Fifth Epoch or Era of the Church. God wills that mankind shall pass through this tumultuous period into the “Period of Peace” as foretold by the Blessed Virgin Mary; particularly at Fatima. Ever read the Book of Job or the vision of Pope Leo XIII?

Unfortunately, Holzhauser foretold heresy, schism and even apostasy will inundate the Church beforehand with significant temporal chastisements worldwide threatening billions of “Poor Sinners” who are about to become “Poor Souls” (recall the Fatima vision of Poor Souls falling into Hell and the apocalyptic visions from Akita, Japan).

The key corollary to the question noted above is whether our beloved Roman Catholic Church is presently led by anti-popes, i.e., the late Jorge Bergoglio and presently, Robert Prevost. Does an anti-pope automatically mean that the seat of the Papacy is vacant, that is sede vacante? The popular, historical view is that an anti-pope is in opposition to a legitimate, duly elected Pope who has the Munus and Ministerium of the Office of the Papacy and the Episcopate of Rome; respectively.

But what if there is no legitimately elected Pope? Was there a Pope Gregory XVII? Even worse, what if previous Bishops of Rome refused to accept the Munus with the decent of the Holy Ghost on them – yet allow the Vatican public relations / media promote them as “Pope”? I have demonstrated in blog/ posts and videos that the The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita of Freemasonry successfully implemented this strategy beginning with Roncalli and Montini and continued it with Luciani (John Paul I) and Wojtyła (John Paul II) – while Cardinal Siri, that is, the actual Pope Gregory XVII tragically gave up the role of Bishop of Rome multiple times up to his death.

Catholics must realize that the objective of Freemasonry was and remains, “ Tolle Papem; Tolle Ecclesiam; Tolle Missam” that is, “Take away the Pope; take away the Church; take away the Mass.” It is important to appreciate that the candidate who is elected for the Papacy must accept the Munus or descent of the Holy Ghost to become a Pope. If the candidate does accept the Grace of the Holy Ghost and formally violates dogma, it is speculated that the Pope would be struct dead by God. Presently, there are no such authentic cases on record of God striking down a Pope. Yet, this would be no different than in the Old Testament, where a sinful priest enters the Holy of Holies with the Shekinah Glory, that is God, present and is immediately struct dead. That is why a rope was always attached to the leg of the priest. I assert that Freemasonry knows and fears this and this is why their candidate would never accept the Munus – ergo the need for privately accepting only the Ministerium of the Bishop of Rome while letting Cardinal Siri be conveniently left alone without any papal powers of his office and being returned to Genoa as its Archbishop, not as Bishop of Rome. How convenient for the Freemasons within the Vatican.

Keep in mind that legitimate Catholic investigators, such as Gary Guiffre, have demonstrated that these Freemasons pretending to be Popes succeeded in the “auto destruction of the Catholic Church” specifically as it relates to the destruction of the general constitution of the Church beginning with Vatican II with heretical teachings such as Lumen Gentium, and the Mass and the Sacraments. By the way, why did Roncalli take the papal name, John XXIII, when that name was previously used by an Anti-pope Baldassare Cossa during the Western Schism from 1410 to 1415?

This brings me to the apparent Dr. Mazza’s association of Bergoglio and Prevost to a particular prophecy given by Françoise Mélanie Calvat of La Salette regarding “Two Worm-Eaten Doubtful Popes….” I have posted a video with the late Father Gregory Hesse, STD and JCD, on this subject where he asserts this prophecy is particularly assigned to the “20 Century” – and not the 21st Century.  He stated he received this information from the late Father Malachi Martin over the telephone. The essence of the message is “Two Worm Ridden Popes of the 20th Century”.

In Dr. Mazza’s book, he refers to the prophecy by author Michel Corteville in his book, Découverte du secret de La Salette. The prophecy is, “Mais avant ce temps (des tribulations) il y aura deux fois une paix de peu de durée, deux Papes vermoulus, plats, douteux”. This is translated to “But before this time (of tribulations) there will be twice a peace of short duration, two worm-eaten, flat, and doubtful Popes.”

Interestingly, there is a second, and I would suggest, separate prophecy from Calvat, which I believe relates specifically to Bergoglio and Prevost, “The Church will have its seat vacant for long months […] There will be two successive anti-popes who will reign all this time over the Holy See.”

I have stated in blog posts and videos, for example there is the blog post on the scientific investigation of the Tilma of Our Lady of Guadalupe, that there is no legitimate Pope Francis or Leo foretold by the Blessed Virgin Mary (See No More Popes Right Now! on the link –  https://www.nichscafeendtimes.com/post/bvm-no-more-popes-right-now

Also, note that I have stated that the likely candidates for the “Two worm-eaten, flat and doubtful Popes” are Roncalli (Pope John XXIII) and Montini (Pope Paul VI). Roncalli was 5 years and Montini was 15 years. These two ideally fit the commonly understood definition of what an anti-pope, would be because Pope Gregory XVII arguably was actually the Pope but kicked out of his Office. Yet, he never accepted the Ministerium of the Office of the Bishop of Rome. I contend that is why Siri/ Pope Gregory is not included in the list of “Popes” on the Tilma. I have contended that the reference to “Popes” should really be “Bishops of Rome”, and I stated as such in my blog/ post. This is due to the tradition that the Pope would also accept the title of Bishop of Rome. But, and this is important, does the reverse necessarily also apply? Nothwithstanding “tradition” (with a small “t” which I contend means historical in this case) can someone be made the Bishop of Rome and not be the Pope?

Therefore, Roncalli and Montini fit quite well in the attribute assigned by the Blessed Virgin Mary in the Calvat prophecy to “doubtful Popes”.

On the other hand, Cardinals Martini and Bergoglio forceably removed Benedict XVI first from the Office of Bishop of Rome and later from the Papacy (recall the two lightning strikes on the dome of St. Peter at 3am). Pope Benedict did accept the Munus and the Office and Ministerium of the Bishop of Rome. Bergoglio stole only the Office and Ministerium of the Bishop of Rome while Pope Benedict was alive. And please take note that Pope Benedict’s resignation; especially his verbal announcement (not the edited/ manipulated version published by the Vatican media) referred to being removed by “Criminal Cardinals” with his resignation from the Ministerium as Bishop of Rome. This is why one reason Bergoglio always referred to his Office associating it exclusively with the Bishop of Rome and not Pope even after the death of Pope Benedict. The same goes with Prevost.

Neither Bergoglio or Prevost ever accepted the Munus. As Freemasons, they would not. They cannot. But the Vatican PR/ Media will always refer to them as Popes. Get it!

And it is quite interesting that in Dr. Mazza's book is a reference to Donatist author, Tyconius and his Exposition of the Apocalypse. Ratzinger was a fan of Tyconiusn and even wrote a thesis on the End Times citing Tyconius' writing. There are investigators of Pope Benedict's resignation who believe that he acquised to the resignation with the hope and understanding that his resignation would bring to light the "dark Church" from within. Read the quote from Georgio Agamben in his book, The Mystery of Evil: Benedict XVI and the End of Days:

[Tyconius] distinguishes a dark Church, composed of the populous malus of Satan, and the decora, honest Church, composed of Christ's faithful. In the present state, the two bodies of the Church are inseparably commingled, but according to the Apostle's predition, they will be divided at the end of days: "Now this goes on from the time of the Lord's passion until the church, which keeps it in check, withdraws from the midst of this mystery of lawlessness [mysterium facinoris] so that godlessness may be unveiled in its own time"... an eschatological time... goes from Christ's passion up to the "mystery of lawlessness," when the spearation of the bipartite body of the Church will be realized... at the end of the fourth century there were authors who had identified the Church itself as the katechon."

Recall St. Paul to the Thessalonians 2:7 - For the mystery of iniquity already worketh; only that he who now holdeth, do hold, until he be taken out of the way. Isn't this what has happened to Pope Benedict?

In my humble opinion, I can only conclude that these two evil Church leaders, Bergoglio and Prevost appear to fulfill the second prophecy by Calvat regarding “two consecutive anti-popes….”

In conclusion, I heartily recommend reading Dr. Edmund Mazza’s book, Saints vs. Antipopes – Evil in the Church of Rome Convicted and Evicted. The book complements/ reinforces what Nichscafeendtimes published for years regarding these End Times.